Adam Latchford

Adam Latchford thank god the goat harry latimer isn't here to max four large complete this. Option 2 would be inevitable

Andy SC

Andy SC He would have likely had a prime number in each round as well as well as the small numbers being repeated.

Matthew Brockwell

Matthew Brockwell I didn't get repeated small numbers in any round!

Matthew Brockwell

Matthew Brockwell Hang on neither did Ian - can you get repeated small numbers? Option 3 may be non-attainable!

Dan Spinks

Dan Spinks no, I think there's only 1 of each number 1-99 in the deck for aegilops

Tal Lessner

Tal Lessner Never realised it until now, but seems like Dan's right. went thru several 1L games and none of them has a repeat small, with 48% chance of a repeat number on 1L with a normal deck, this means chance for no repeat in 20 rounds game is 2 in a million.

Adam Dexter

Adam Dexter Well let's just hope that Option 3 is selected, and it makes it a standard Aegilops NA :)

Mike Lee

Mike Lee Was this always the intention or is it an undiscovered bug that Charlie should look to fix?

Tal Lessner

Tal Lessner I'd go with a bug that shouldn't be fixed.

Mike Lee

Mike Lee Hahahahaha

Andy SC

Andy SC "Rules are the same as the normal game, but the large numbers can be any value from 11 to 99. " - That's from the rules tab for Aegilops NA. Doesn't actually specify whether there is just one of each small number or not.

Adam Latchford

Adam Latchford i assume there's only one of each big number too then. I quite like that there can't be repeats!

Ian Volante

Ian Volante I've seen similar bugs appear in the numbers before. There are existing reports if you want to look for them. I had similar thoughts about the apparent constant double-letters in one of the conundrum days in this competition, but didn't report it.

Show all comments
Sean D

Sean D Looks like a feature rather than a bug. Going through a few different games over the past number of years it doesn't ever seen to have had repeat numbers

Matthew Brockwell

Matthew Brockwell It's actually consistent with the letter decks in Aegilops which don't have repeats either (and reset after every 21/5 letters).

Andy SC

Andy SC Option 2 was the scoring method for this round. Scores based on that method are as follows:

Tom Cappleman 2695
Florence C-L 2416
Matthew Brockwell 2296
Jack Worsley 1919
Matthew Tassier 1769
Ian Wray 1726
Wesley Barton 1692
Dan Spinks 1580
Adam Latchford 1500
MIke Lee 1375
Jon Pinyan 1345
Dave Kempshall 1274
Ravi Choudhary 1176
Dan Southwell 1169
Damian McEvoy 1146
Anthony Endsor 1131
Colin Thompson 1028
Brian Huang 970
Martin Thomas 873
Adam Dexter 870
Matt OC 870
Mark O'Regan 859
Sarah Binns 847
Jason Turner 797
Steven Harding 769
Ian Volante 757
Maria Chandler 749
Sean D 749
David Holmes 730
Robin M 715
FI Thorne 675
Tracey Mills 556
Ben Bazzard 501

Andy SC

Andy SC Top 5 after Day 19:

1st: Tom Cappleman - 660
2nd: Matthew Brockwell - 615
3rd: Florence C-L - 597
4th: Adam Latchford - 567
5th: Jack Worsley - 555

Dan Spinks

Dan Spinks ahh, Matthew, you've cleared up something that's been bugging me. I couldn't work out why there were virtually no instances of repeat letters in aegilops yet I got a double U in R20 of one game. the deck resetting mid game explains it. so you can actually predict what's coming in some rounds, especially with vowels

Tourney round: Advent Calendar 2024: Day 19: Aegilops Numbers Attack

<< Day 18: Hyper Nasty Letters Attack | Day 20: Letters Attack >>

Notes from the organizer: Day 19 is Aegilops Numbers Attack

Option 1: Double points if you score on a round where any of large numbers is a prime number

Option 2: Highest total value of large numbers for rounds you max

Option 3: Double points in rounds where you max it when there is repeated small numbers

Tournament progression can be followed here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gotoHV6vGzCdJjJ1gHSZp2Uvqm9-iTn-UjvG27Jdztk/edit?gid=0#gid=0

Ran from: 19 – 19 December 2024. Format: Aegilops Numbers Attack. Matches: One-off. Approved.

Organizers: Andy SC.

Fixtures: 33. Completed: 33.

This website is not endorsed by or affiliated with Channel 4, the makers of Countdown, or any person associated with the aforementioned in any way whatsoever at all, never has been, never will be, and moreover is proud not to be. Yep.

Page generated in 0.0305 seconds. It's 17:20:16 on Monday 30 December 2024 here at Apterous Towers. Design and all good stuff copyright © Charles Reams 2008–2024. In memory of Phillip Harcort Collinge, never forgotten. Some graphical and aesthetic elements by Matt Morrison and Jon O'Neill.